June 5, 2009

What sins are on display? Only gluttony, right?

"If you really practiced any lust worth talking about, you wouldn't be type type typing in front of your computer screen all the live long day - you'd be out doing the lustful things you only talk about."

6 comments:

traditionalguy said...

Meade: that comment disillusioned us about Titus who has become a part of our imaginations lke the old radio days shows. Next you will be telling us that Jack Benney was generous and the Lone-a-Ranger was only a Banker.

rhhardin said...

Sloth is the only sin named after an animal.

You never run into a covet, though Thurber may have put one into a cartoon.

rhhardin said...

The covet would be in Thurber's _Extinct Animals of Bermuda_ if anywhere, I'd guess.

I don't see my copy.

traditionalguy said...

Hey, a "covet" is lusting for your neighbor's wife, etc. people need to find a wife, house and an ass of their own to lust after all day long. Then they can read the Best Lust ever in 7 easy lessons while their hair drys.

Penny said...

"Meade: that comment disillusioned us about Titus"

NOTHING could disillusion me about Titus, well except a decision to leave Althouse to lust and love even more than he does.

Heck, can't you see this man takes multi-tasking to a new level? He types faster than anyone here! That alone should give him plenty extra time to fit in gym and dinners and quickies.

halojones-fan said...

You think I can't be lustful sitting here in front of a computer? Man, this is the Internet. You ain't seen what I've seen. You ain't seen what I'VE SEEN...

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.