Typical Reuters bias. They may admit that he finished dead last out of 20, but they didn't mention that Richard Nixon came in at 19, The Noid at 18 and a swift kick in the shins at 17. They have to spin it somehow...
Even Newt Gingrich, not exactly Mr. Charm, finished well above Kerry in the poll. Apparently just Being John Kerry has a more toxic effect on the public than announcing at your wife's deathbed that you're divorcing her for a younger woman.
How good feeling thermometers are depends on the type of question asked. When people are aware of the subject of the question (be it a person or a policy) but don't know much about it and are unwilling to say they don't know enough (which is pretty common) they have a tendency to give it a lukewarm response of 50.
So, in this case, regardless of the margin of error {where did you see that reported?](or were you thinking of the standard error of the mean for each question, which is another matter?), what would appear to be important is the distance of the rating from 50 given the percentage who felt they knew enough to give a rating.
Thus, those above 55 are pretty well-liked for sure and those below 45 are pretty well dis-liked for sure and those between 45 and 55 are really within the margin of error when a fairly large percentage of the respondents give a rating.
So, despite their likability quotients, neither Bush nor Bill Clinton can run for president again, so why should they worry. Kerry should worry, as should Al Gore. Both below 45 and evidently are well enough known to large percentages of the respondents. Bill Richardson, for instance, gets rated by only 1/3 respondents. His rating is probably skewed severely by those claiming to know him well enough and giving him a 50.
Also, I'd like to see the range, variation, skew, kurtosis, etc on the individual thermometers, although at 95% responding and a 39, Kerry is obviously in trouble.
My wife, who, in the course of 18 years of marriage, has almost never said anything bad about anyone, called John Kerry, "the most loathsome human being I've ever met." She's a liberal Catholic with an advanced degree in international relations, who happened to encounter John Kerry at the Fletcher School upon a time. Meeting him and hearing him speak in person made her a confirmed Bush voter when the opportunity came. I was shocked. She's politically to the left of me, and I wouldn't vote for George Bush. (I hasten to add I don't hate Bush; I just disagree with him. That seems to disqualify me for membership in the Democratic Party.) I also wouldn't vote for John Kerry, so the top of my ballot was unpolluted by either of these twerps.
My wife was spoiled by meeting and spending some time with Paul Tsongas, who was the Senator and Presidential candidate we should have had. May he rest in peace.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
8 comments:
Typical Reuters bias. They may admit that he finished dead last out of 20, but they didn't mention that Richard Nixon came in at 19, The Noid at 18 and a swift kick in the shins at 17. They have to spin it somehow...
aren't polls helpful! so i take it you were to rank order the choices...hmmm i wonder who finished 21st....was tom cruise in the poll?
Even Newt Gingrich, not exactly Mr. Charm, finished well above Kerry in the poll. Apparently just Being John Kerry has a more toxic effect on the public than announcing at your wife's deathbed that you're divorcing her for a younger woman.
People liked him before they didn't like him
I agree with this poll. Therefore it is not botched.
How good feeling thermometers are depends on the type of question asked. When people are aware of the subject of the question (be it a person or a policy) but don't know much about it and are unwilling to say they don't know enough (which is pretty common) they have a tendency to give it a lukewarm response of 50.
So, in this case, regardless of the margin of error {where did you see that reported?](or were you thinking of the standard error of the mean for each question, which is another matter?), what would appear to be important is the distance of the rating from 50 given the percentage who felt they knew enough to give a rating.
Thus, those above 55 are pretty well-liked for sure and those below 45 are pretty well dis-liked for sure and those between 45 and 55 are really within the margin of error when a fairly large percentage of the respondents give a rating.
So, despite their likability quotients, neither Bush nor Bill Clinton can run for president again, so why should they worry. Kerry should worry, as should Al Gore. Both below 45 and evidently are well enough known to large percentages of the respondents. Bill Richardson, for instance, gets rated by only 1/3 respondents. His rating is probably skewed severely by those claiming to know him well enough and giving him a 50.
Also, I'd like to see the range, variation, skew, kurtosis, etc on the individual thermometers, although at 95% responding and a 39, Kerry is obviously in trouble.
My wife, who, in the course of 18 years of marriage, has almost never said anything bad about anyone, called John Kerry, "the most loathsome human being I've ever met." She's a liberal Catholic with an advanced degree in international relations, who happened to encounter John Kerry at the Fletcher School upon a time. Meeting him and hearing him speak in person made her a confirmed Bush voter when the opportunity came. I was shocked. She's politically to the left of me, and I wouldn't vote for George Bush. (I hasten to add I don't hate Bush; I just disagree with him. That seems to disqualify me for membership in the Democratic Party.) I also wouldn't vote for John Kerry, so the top of my ballot was unpolluted by either of these twerps.
My wife was spoiled by meeting and spending some time with Paul Tsongas, who was the Senator and Presidential candidate we should have had. May he rest in peace.
Sorry, haters, God's not finished with him yet!
Post a Comment